Received 30.08.2022
Revised 05.11.2022
Accepted 26.12.2022
Retrieved from Vol. 25, No. 2, 2022
Pages 106 -113
Abstract
In the article, taking into account the results of the methodological and theoretical substantiation of the scientific foundations of professional training, a systematic analysis of the data of the ascertainment experimental work on the study of the axiological foundations of the educational process was carried out in order to develop the target and technological blocks of the context-professional model of the training of future masters (culturalists, historians, religious studies, philologists, philosophers). The tasks of ascertaining research include: 1) to find out how the respondents understand the essence of the master's training system on axiological grounds; 2) identify and systematize the leading groups of values and value attitudes, according to the master's students; 3) to determine possible options for prospective improvement of the content, technologies and methods of training specialists on axiological grounds. Methods of ascertaining research: questionnaire (frequency analysis of answers); ESE content analysis; expert assessments; computer quantification; observation; quantitative and qualitative display of data; ranking; stepwise statistical processing. On the basis of theoretical research, experimental examination and generalization of materials, the development of the axiological foundations of the context-professional model of training future masters in the humanitarian field is determined in the perspective of the research; it was analyzed that the educational training environment should be based on the principles of axiology and open learning: reliance on information technologies; design of modern content of education; development of innovative methods of formation and development of the valuable component of professional competences; solving the problems of measuring the quality of education; changes in the traditional role of the teacher as a translator of knowledge and mastering the role of a mentor, senior colleague, consultant, scientific supervisor
Keywords:
axiological principles; university education; humanitarian field; master's training; professional axiosphere; ascertaining experiment; diagnostic methods[1] Hogenraad R. (2003). Force and Influence in content analysis: The production of new social knowledge. Quality and Quantity, 37(3), 221-238.
[2] Ignenkamp, K. (1991). Pedagogical diagnostics. Moscow: Pedagogika.
[3] Kaidanovska, O. (2015). Theoretical and methodological foundations of fine arts training of architects in higher education institutions. Kyiv: National Pedagogical Dragomanov University.
[4] Kosteva Y.I. (2014). Development of humanistic values of students of natural sciences in higher pedagogical educational institutions (second half of the XX - beginning of the XXI century). Yalta: Republican Higher Educational Institution “Crimean Humanitarian University”.
[5] Kravchenko, L.M. (1996). Professional diagnostics in the system of postgraduate teacher training. Kyiv.
[6] Kyveryalg, A.A. (1980). Research methods in professional pedagogy. Tallinn: Valgus.
[7] Polatayko, O.M. (2014). Art education in the dimensions of modernity: problems of theory and practice: a collective monograph. Dnipro.
[8] Tunik, E.E. (2002). Psychodiagnostics of creative thinking. Creative tests. St. Petersburg: Didactika Plus.
[9] Vynnychuk, R. (2019). The axiological dimension of professional training of masters in the humanities: Methodology, theory, practice: Monograph. Poltava: V. G. Korolenko Poltava National Pedagogical University.
[10] Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.